www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
X-RZG-AUTH: | :L3UDYkmmW/5gvS7m89gzr8vfKmzK2Ft8ydnRhMfYajCTGOJ4GpZ3FWTYNwsDobJ1 |
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: | mo00 |
Message-ID: | <4C6456E8.4080808@apconsult.de> |
Date: | Thu, 12 Aug 2010 22:17:44 +0200 |
From: | DaveLaw <cygwin AT apconsult DOT de> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: CygWin Security & Performance Issues |
References: | <201008121351 DOT o7CDp56h018152 AT post DOT webmailer DOT de> <20100812140244 DOT GH14202 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <7359-1281637768-267998 AT sneakemail DOT com> <20100812191551 DOT GD26062 AT trikaliotis DOT net> |
In-Reply-To: | <20100812191551.GD26062@trikaliotis.net> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Maybe the co-leader of the project should channel her efforts into just that, rather than getting peoples backs up with unnecessary nitpicking about how she thinks they should structure their emails. Best Regards, DaveLaw On 12.08.2010 21:15, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: > * On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:29:27PM -0400 Robert Jacobson wrote: >> On 8/12/2010 10:02 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >>> Ok, I'll not waste my time and reply to you another time. That makes >>> both of us happy. >> Is this what passes for professional behavior at Red Hat? > You mean, the co-leader of the project should let herself be insulted > from a person who got his answers, but did not even give a thank you? > Note also that this is the "open" Cygwin list. That is, this is not a > paid support channel. I would consider it more like some people give > advice for free, and not necessarily with the hat of Red Hat. > > I'll go back in lurk mode again... > > Regards, > Spiro. > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |