Mail Archives: cygwin/2010/05/10/09:42:28
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
|
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
|
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org
|
MIME-Version: | 1.0
|
In-Reply-To: | <AANLkTim_LLx6oY1HhxfipgSRBFSHD0OOQwhacy5CzMmN@mail.gmail.com>
|
References: | <AANLkTilNtTrx2Z9ubWBLcedCC38AXaYBm59y439_oBtb AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <m2g845c0f81005080622saed8506v996acc4c756c64e3 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <AANLkTim_LLx6oY1HhxfipgSRBFSHD0OOQwhacy5CzMmN AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
|
From: | David Eisner <deisner AT gmail DOT com>
|
Date: | Mon, 10 May 2010 09:41:50 -0400
|
Message-ID: | <AANLkTikX700vW_j3GSRoJQS4yss2Ol0QRfyL9h_iBUxl@mail.gmail.com>
|
Subject: | Re: Cygwin visual brand
|
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
|
X-IsSubscribed: | yes
|
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
|
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com>
|
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
|
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
|
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
|
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
|
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
|
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
|
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
|
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
|
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Berthold Barth
<berthold DOT barth AT googlemail DOT com> wrote:
> PS: On the subject of relevance: Good design (visuals, workings, user
> experience) is widely accepted to improve the users' perception of the
> functionality. Beautiful things work better. Even if the new design
I couldn't agree more, and I wholeheartedly support your proposed
efforts. I'm not a designer, but in my opinion the importance of
high-quality graphic design and visual branding is often
under-estimated. On a perhaps subconscious level, the website
appearance and project logo communicate to a new user something about
the perceived quality of a project, and even it relevance.
A few months ago somebody on this list offered an appealing redesign
of the Cygwin.com website. [1][2] That, unfortunately, seems to have
gone nowhere (unless something is happening behind the scenes).
As far as the current logo, it has served the project well but it
definitely looks dated. [3] It's basically a two-color unaliased
bitmap that harkens back to icons of 1980's and 1990's. My personal
preference for a new logo would be an evolution of the current design.
Ideally it would scale, perhaps with modifications, to work from
small sizes (for a window titlebar) to large (for the website, e.g.).
The historical evolution of the Mozilla Firefox logo might provide
some guidance. [4][5][6]
Or we could go in a completely new direction. For what it's worth,
I've been using Cygwin for years and had no idea about the hippo
artwork.
-David
[1] http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-03/msg00700.html
[2] http://cygwin.codecamel.com/
[3] http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-icon.gif
[4] http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/about/logo/download.html
[5] http://www.actsofvolition.com/archive/2004/february/brandingmozilla
[6] http://www.actsofvolition.com/files/mozillabranding/
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -