X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4BC5B95F.4030605@bopp.net>
Date:	Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:47:27 -0500
From:	Jeremy Bopp <jeremy AT bopp DOT net>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Poderosa problem in 1.7
References:	<COL108-W4632EC80A284E61324D3218B100 AT phx DOT gbl>
In-Reply-To:	<COL108-W4632EC80A284E61324D3218B100@phx.gbl>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

PJ Whitelock wrote:
> Does anyone have a work around for Poderosa's incompatability with cygwin 1.7, ie looking for mount points in the registry when they're no longer there. Can you just create a fake registry entry with the same info as the fstab?

As long as you don't have a legitimate Cygwin 1.5 installation laying
around, there shouldn't be any reason that having those phony registry
entries will hurt you.  Whether or not that will be enough to trick
Ponderosa is something you'll have to test.  I'm also not sure if
setup.exe will notice the entries and complain or delete them.  Make
sure to give that a try too just to be sure.

-Jeremy

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -