www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40 |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Date: | Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:49:06 +0100 |
From: | Spiro Trikaliotis <an-cygwin AT spiro DOT trikaliotis DOT net> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-ID: | <20100312204906.GA8799@trikaliotis.net> |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <2BF01EB27B56CC478AD6E5A0A28931F2C1E28C AT A1DAL1SWPES19MB DOT ams DOT acs-inc DOT net> <4B9A5ADA DOT 2030708 AT redhat DOT com> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <4B9A5ADA.2030708@redhat.com> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: | 87.163.226.223 |
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: | an-cygwin AT spiro DOT trikaliotis DOT net |
Subject: | Re: the .exe extension |
X-SA-Exim-Version: | 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000) |
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: | Yes (on mail.trikaliotis.net) |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Hello Eric, * On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 08:16:42AM -0700 Eric Blake wrote: > In general, cygwin does not care if the .exe is missing, but other > programs (particularly cmd) do, so it is better if PE-COFF files are > given the .exe extension. Is it really better to add the .exe extension? May I ask which problem it is this renaming tries to solve? I ask because here have been some discussions about the problems imposed by renaming to .exe. However, I could not come up with a problem that can be solved with this renaming: If I really, really need the .exe extension, I can generate it myself. So, why should Cygwin do it automatically? Thank you (or anyone else) for any explanations, Spiro. -- Spiro R. Trikaliotis http://opencbm.sf.net/ http://www.trikaliotis.net/ http://www.viceteam.org/ -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |