Mail Archives: cygwin/2010/02/17/19:42:10
On 02/16/2010 03:28 PM, Stephen Grant Brown wrote:
> Hi Larry,
> Thanks for your quick response.
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)"
> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 6:13 AM
> Subject: Re: AddAccessAllowedAce(, owner) failed: 1337
>
>
>> On 02/16/2010 01:20 AM, Stephen Grant Brown wrote:
>>> Again no output from the 1.7 cygcheck
>>>
>>> Is the cygwin1.dll from 1.5 still in memory and being accessed by the
>>> cygcheck in 1.7 when I renamed it?
>>>
>>> Am I correct in saying that I am not getting any output from the
>>> cygcheck from 1.7?
>>>
>>> How do you suggest I run cygcheck?
>>
>> I'm not sure. 'cygcheck' doesn't require 'cygwin1.dll' to run. It's a
>> pure
>> Win32 program. If it's not running, that points to something local
>> getting
>> in it's way. Again, I can only think of BLODA or other type of security
>> application/service. Is there anything else you're running that fits this
>> description? I also find it odd that 'cygcheck' from 1.5 runs while 1.7
>> doesn't. Perhaps the output (_attached_) from the 1.5 version will
>> provide
>> some insight if you can't find anything else causing the problem.
>>
>> --
>> Larry Hall
>
> I have had symantec running before but I have removed it to the best of
> my ability
> (I have not reformatted the hard disk and started with a fresh install
> of windows.)
>
> cygcheck from 1.5 produces output.
> cygcheck from 1.7 does not.
> How does cygcheck determine the location of the cygin installation to
> check?
It looks in the registry for a pointer to it. It's the same information
you get from 'mount'. Does that work? Does 'cygcheck -cd' work?
> Can I use the cygcheck from 1.5 to check the installation of 1.7?
No, but it will tell you about 1.5. If your 1.7 is truly DOA, it might
be good to know if your 1.5 results suggest anything.
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746
_____________________________________________________________________
A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -