X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4B6746A5.3090203@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:24:53 +0000
From:	Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: dlclose not calling destructors of static variables.
References:	<4B61732F DOT 4030804 AT gmail DOT com> <4B62DDE6 DOT 5070106 AT gmail DOT com> <4B62F118 DOT 8010305 AT gmail DOT com> <20100129184514 DOT GA9550 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4B66BF2F DOT 4060802 AT gmail DOT com> <20100201162603 DOT GB25374 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4B6710CE DOT 40300 AT gmail DOT com> <20100201174611 DOT GA26080 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20100201175123 DOT GB26080 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4B672B74 DOT 4090808 AT gmail DOT com> <4B673D5F DOT 4050104 AT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<4B673D5F.4050104@gmail.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 01/02/2010 20:45, Andrew wrote:

> I'm not looking to submit a patch to fix this, I'll leave that up to the 
> professionals who have a better idea about the whole picture. It's just
> I've hit a brick wall with my code with this bug so I'm looking for some
> work arounds for myself.

  No, really, you've been a ton of help, thanks a million.  Try the patch I
just posted to the cygwin-patches list, on top of current CVS:

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2010-q1/msg00051.html

  That should get you going with your current DLLs.

  Next step is to add the cxx abi functions.  I found an old patch lying
around, seems I started looking at this back in August and then lost track of
it somehow (probably in the rush approaching the end of gcc stage 1, I guess),
so I owe you apologies for the inconvenience.

    cheers,
      DaveK


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -