X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<26970430.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:02:51 -0800 (PST)
From:	mtuma <marianotuma AT hotmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin Apache installation problem
In-Reply-To:	<4B3B8B22.5030907@etr-usa.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
References:	<26968571 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <4B3B8B22 DOT 5030907 AT etr-usa DOT com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Thank you for your relpy.

You were right. I've extracted the tar file onto a different directory and
it did worked like a charm. This is a COE system so I might have space
issues in the previous folder, as you said.

The reason I want to use apache for cygwin is because I need to use cygwin's
perl in some cgi pages.

Thanks again.


Warren Young wrote:
> 
> On 12/30/2009 8:23 AM, mtuma wrote:
>>
>> checking for APR... reconfig
>> configuring package in srclib/apr now
>> /bin/sh: /cygdrive/c/Documents: No such file or directory
>> configure failed for srclib/apr
> 
> It's clearly barfing on the space in "c:\Documents and Settings".  The 
> question is why it thinks it needs to be looking in that part of your 
> hard disk.  You can find out by looking at the config.log for APR.  Use 
> keywords from the above four lines to find the appropriate section of 
> the log; it won't be super-easy to find, due to the verbosity of 
> autoconf logs.
> 
> Incidentally, why can't you just use the native Windows version of 
> Apache?  It'll be a lot faster than a Cygwin build, and it's fully 
> supported.  I imagine this is the main reason the last Cygwin package 
> for Apache is still 1.3, those being the days when the native Windows 
> port of Apache was still a bit weak.
> 
> --
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Cygwin-Apache-installation-problem-tp26968571p26970430.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -