X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4B1E6316.1090005@etr-usa.com>
Date:	Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:30:46 -0700
From:	Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Cygwin-L <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: SOCK_RAW raw socket and cygwin
References:	<8C8865ED624BB94F8FE50259E2B5C5B304593DB2E4 AT palmail03 DOT lsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<8C8865ED624BB94F8FE50259E2B5C5B304593DB2E4@palmail03.lsi.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Leyendecker, Robert wrote:
> Is it possible to use a SOCK_RAW in cygwin for read and
> write of IP packets? 

While it's possible Cygwin is breaking something here, I'd first verify 
that you're not exceeding the underlying stack's capabilities.  See the 
Winsock Programmer's FAQ, item 4.1:

	http://tangentsoft.net/wskfaq/advanced.html#rawsocket

It happens that I'm back to working on the FAQ again, so if you learn 
anything about raw sockets that you think should go in the FAQ, let me 
know.  Off-list, of course.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -