www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Date: | Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:24:02 +0100 |
From: | Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: malloc overrides |
Message-ID: | <20091105182402.GU26344@calimero.vinschen.de> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <4AF29EC2 DOT 2050808 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <4AF2D091 DOT 4030508 AT gmail DOT com> <4AF30A85 DOT 5070208 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <416096c60911051022obc335ceu15dc7ee0e487cb66 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <416096c60911051022obc335ceu15dc7ee0e487cb66@mail.gmail.com> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Nov 5 18:22, Andy Koppe wrote: > 2009/11/5 Yaakov (Cygwin/X): > >>> extern void _exit (int); > >>> extern char* strdup (const char*); > >> > >> static int are_we_stuck = 1; > >>> > >>> char* malloc(unsigned n) { > >> > >> are_we_stuck = 0; > >>> > >>> return 0; > >>> } > >>> > >>> int main(void) { > >>> strdup("yo"); > >> > >> _exit (are_we_stuck); > >>> > >>> } > >> > >> FTFY. > > > > Funny, as I went to sleep last night I thought of just that solution. In > > practice, though, while it doesn't hang, it doesn't give the correct answer > > either. As Corinna said, the malloc override needs to be functional, in > > that it allocates memory which can then be free()d. So this isn't going to > > be quite so simple. :-( > > Does the memory actually need to be freed? Cygwin itself calls free, so the application implementation has to provide both. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |