X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4AB80F5A.6070402@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:42:18 -0500
From:	"Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090715 Thunderbird/3.0b3
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [1.7] gvim "Cannot fork" error
References:	<h8cl9e$pd1$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <a9a39a210909120714n126aed2dpb7beead460a870b0 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20090921022457 DOT GA32232 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4AB73096 DOT 9030407 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <20090921144827 DOT GA15626 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To:	<20090921144827.GA15626@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 21/09/2009 09:48, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> gdb said that the failure was coming from libxcb-1.dll so I rebuilt
> libxcb-1.dll with debugging information and with a version of
> libcygwin.a containing debugging symbols.

Wait, did I just hear an argument for split debug packages? :-)

> The fix for the problem wasn't immediately obvious and it is very hacky.
> I hope it can be removed in a couple of years when everything that was
> built using a buggy version of libcygwin.a is gone.  The problem came
> from one of the X libraries that, if it had been relinked recently,
> would not have manifested a problem.  I'm embarrassed to admit that I
> didn't record which library had the problem, though.  Tracking it down
> in gdb proved to be sort of time-consuming and now the window with the
> information is gone.
>
> I can say that any DLL built with cygwin-1.7.0-51 - cygwin-1.7.0-56
> is probably suspect.  That's 2009-07-13 - 2009-08-13 .

Among the X.Org libraries, only libxcb and libX11 were built with those 
versions.  I am in the process of rebuilding both now.


Yaakov

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -