www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <4AB0BE8A.6060707@gmail.com> |
Date: | Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:31:38 +0100 |
From: | Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com> |
User-Agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Cygwin 1.7/1.5 C99 conformance (GCC, libc) |
References: | <op DOT u0ak2ujy1e62zd AT balu DOT cs DOT uni-paderborn DOT de> |
In-Reply-To: | <op.u0ak2ujy1e62zd@balu.cs.uni-paderborn.de> |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Matthias Andree wrote: > Now, Cygwin 1.5 and 1.7 appear to lack long double library support in > libc/libm -- which is required for a hosted C99 implementation however, > but not for a freestanding C99 implementation. > > Trying to solve this, I found another Cygwin issue: GCC 3.4.4 sets > __STDC_HOSTED__ to 1 by default (that's a GCC factory default). Just FTR, Cygwin-1.5 and gcc-3.4.4 are end-of-life and will never be updated again. > I propose that this gets overridden to 0 in Cygwin-ported GCC compilers > until the library support for a C99-conforming full hosted > implementation is in place, so that applications can safely check Sorry, I don't think that's a good idea. There are a whole world of other differences implied by the freestanding-vs-hosted distinction that I think it would not be wise for the compiler to lie about. It is indeed unfortunate that our C library support (which derives from newlib) is incomplete, and this gap between theory and practice is what autoconf was invented to bridge. (Autoconf is of course a compromise born of necessity which in an ideal world wouldn't exist. But at least it means these problems can be dealt with in a practical and systematic fashion.) It mightn't be too hard to get long double support into newlib, but it's all a matter of someone having the time and wherewithal to actually do it. cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |