X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4A9E4C5C.2090002@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:43:40 +0100
From:	Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Marco Atzeri <marco_atzeri AT yahoo DOT it>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>
Subject:	Re: std::arg() bug : not repetitive ?
References:	<421404 DOT 53076 DOT qm AT web25504 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<421404.53076.qm@web25504.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Marco Atzeri wrote:

> Are this setting acceptable for a cygwin package ?
> 
> -march=pentium4 -msse -mfpmath=sse

  I think this bit of the thread should move to the -apps list.  I can't
answer your question directly, but I'll note that CPUs without SSE support
must be pretty thinly spread these days.  But, if we do this, it really is the
complete death of backward-compatibility for those older CPUs.  I can't say
how much of a bad thing that would be.

    cheers,
      DaveK


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -