X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,EXECUTABLE_URI,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4A982F9F.7060507@cygwin.com>
Date:	Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:27:27 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Adding packages
References:	<416096c60908271159i5e570a34wb61adbed5d6e34f5 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4A96F466 DOT 1080204 AT cygwin DOT com> <416096c60908281155v1b068feeoce674b2edab476eb AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<416096c60908281155v1b068feeoce674b2edab476eb@mail.gmail.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 08/28/2009 02:55 PM, Andy Koppe wrote:
> Larry Hall:
>> Adding a link to<http://cygwin.com/setup.exe>  shouldn't be allot of work
>> and may help if the menu was properly named.
>
> Good idea. I'll throw a name into the ring: "Cygwin package manager".

While I personally would think that's fine, I'm not sure it addresses the
need that sparked this thread offshoot.  For people who have trouble
recognizing that they need to invoke 'setup.exe' to update, add and remove
packages, we might need to be more explicit like "Update/Add/Remove
Cygwin Software".  I'm not married to my alternate wording though.

>>   Beyond that requires significant changes to 'setup.exe'
>
> What would be needed beyond the packaging? I guess one problem is that
> setup.exe couldn't update itself; could it rely on the "do it at next
> reboot" solution instead?

I wasn't actually thinking of packaging 'setup.exe'.  I would think that 
pointing
to the version on the web page is always preferable, because then it's
never out-of-date.  My comments about "significant changes" were relative
to the idea of making 'setup.exe' invoked by any added menu item
start on the package selection page.  Actually, I don't think this would be
real hard (what's another command-line switch after all ;-) ) but it would
take some time and effort to do.  This is significant effort when compared
with the effort required to make no changes. ;-)

>> which would require some volunteer effort to make it happen.
>
> Don't think I've got spare cycles to commit, unfortunately.

Yes, this is a common problem and a recurring theme.  I sympathize.

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -