X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4A82CF78.4050504@comcast.net>
Date:	Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:19:36 -0400
From:	Larry Adams <larryjadams AT comcast DOT net>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Supporting Data Types "ushort_t" and "uchar_t"
References:	<4A82CBB1 DOT 30507 AT comcast DOT net> <20090812141530 DOT GA14016 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<20090812141530.GA14016@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Corinna,

It's Solaris 10 :(.  They must "set" the standard these days ;)

Larry

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 12 10:03, Larry Adams wrote:
>   
>> Hi list,
>>
>> Are there plans to support these two data types in the near future.  I  
>> just ran across this portability issue a few minutes ago.  Using  
>> "CYGWIN_NT-6.1 BASEMENTBOX 1.5.25(0.156/4/2) 2008-06-12 19:34 i686 
>> Cygwin".
>>     
>
> Please point us to a standard which defines them.  I don't see them
> defined anywhere in POSIX.1-2008, nor on any of my Linux machines.
>
>
> Corinna
>
>   

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -