X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_62,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4A7ED4AA.60009@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
Date:	Sun, 09 Aug 2009 09:52:42 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cygwin AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090605 Thunderbird/2.0.0.22 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: libtool: -{shared,static}-libgcc
References:	<4A7E7628 DOT 10105 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
In-Reply-To:	<4A7E7628.10105@users.sourceforge.net>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> The attached patch (against the latest 2.2.7a snapshot, not taking the
> other patch into account) should allow libtool to accept the
> -{shared,static}-libgcc flags and just pass them on to gcc.

It just can't be that simple, can it? Well, for *libgcc* I guess it can,
because there is no libgcc.la.  However, we also need similar
functionality for the other runtime libraries, but they DO have .la
files which throws a monkey wrench into the mix.

Still, IMO a partial solution is better than none...

P.S. Have you gotten an acknowledgment from the FSF that they have
received your completed paperwork?

--
Chuck

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -