X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Jake <Jake_Devore AT playstation DOT sony DOT com>
Subject:	Re: cl.exe and a C1083 error
Date:	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:45:24 +0000 (UTC)
Lines:	30
Message-ID:	<loom.20090806T163729-207@post.gmane.org>
References:	<loom DOT 20090806T024338-157 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <4A7A5832 DOT 4090108 AT cygwin DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Larry Hall (Cygwin <reply-to-list-only-lh <at> cygwin.com> writes:

> I'm going to assume you sent this here because you're using a Cygwin version
> of 'make'.  It really doesn't sound like you're using Cygwin in a way it
> was intended.  You are probably better off looking at Mingw or some other
> native port of 'make'.  Still, from the limited details you've provided,
> you're successfully using Cygwin's 'make' (again, I'm assuming, otherwise
> your inquiry would be off-topic for this list) on other machines and you're
> just having problems on your personal machine.  If that's the case, the
> best advice I can offer is to compare your installation and configuration
> with the successful machines.  That's likely a quicker route to success
> than relying on someone here trying to spot a problem based on the content
> of your email to this list, all things considered.
> 

Yes, we are using the cygwin make.  Our builds all normally happen on unix and
using cygwin works better than wine.  On the machines it works on it's sending
stuff like:

cl.exe /I/usr/local/build/release/include

On my system cl.exe doesn't even pick up the /I with directories like this, on
the build machine it works correctly.  I was hoping there was some setting to
allow windows apps to use the posix path in cygwin.  Is there a way to dump all
the settings from cygwin so that I may diff the results between the machines?

Thanks,

Jake



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -