www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Date: | Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:00:42 -0400 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Please test the latest snapshot! |
Message-ID: | <20090804180042.GC5001@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <347438636 DOT 8310991249398331327 DOT JavaMail DOT root AT sz0059a DOT emeryville DOT ca DOT mail DOT comcast DOT net> <1103417648 DOT 8356341249403449340 DOT JavaMail DOT root AT sz0059a DOT emeryville DOT ca DOT mail DOT comcast DOT net> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <1103417648.8356341249403449340.JavaMail.root@sz0059a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:30:49PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote: >> I'm still seeing some weird stuff in the latest snapshot. This is >> a fresh install, with nothing other than the Base category + git, >> and substituting just cygwin1.dll. >> >> $ git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/libsigsegv.git >> Initialized empty Git repository in /home/eblake/libsigsegv/.git/ >> fatal: write error (Socket operation on non-socket) > >I'm seeing this behavior even as far back as snapshot 20090706, so it >may be some BLODA on this particular machine, rather than a new >failure in the latest snapshot. Other than this weird behavior of >git, I haven't seen anything else misbehave with the 20090804 snapshot. Does that mean you don't see the problem with the 20090704 snapshot or that you haven't tested that far back? I'll try this command out as soon as I can. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |