X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Charles D. Russell" <worwor AT bellsouth DOT net>
Subject:	Re: mingw headers and libraries missing
Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:34:35 -0500
Lines:	20
Message-ID:	<h4nncr$3c1$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:	<5FE114CB-1BD5-450B-BE50-27D7D665CB7D AT uni-dortmund DOT de> <416096c60907271220x50eaca35nc454c41ad6a92d76 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <416096c60907271229n1f87acd0ha410da5dc8c51d54 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <C60F7B43-C1F9-444D-9DA6-DF664FF3FC27 AT uni-dortmund DOT de> <4A6ECECC DOT 7030404 AT gmail DOT com> <5D074DD3-FF46-44EF-B015-59531A8D8DC3 AT uni-dortmund DOT de> <4A6EEA7B DOT 5060502 AT gmail DOT com> <h4n375$sbs$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <4A6F15E8 DOT 80900 AT gmail DOT com>
Reply-To:	worwor AT bellsouth DOT net
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
In-Reply-To:	<4A6F15E8.80900@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Dave Korn wrote:
> Charles D. Russell wrote:
>> Dave Korn wrote:
>>
>>>   You have just discovered why -mno-cygwin is a kludgey hack that we are
>>> removing from future versions of the compiler!
>> Kludgey perhaps, but handy for me.  If I want to give a copy of one of
>> my fortran console apps to a colleague, I can simply recompile it with
>> -mno-cygwin. No knowledge of Windows is required on my part. I'll be
>> sorry to see that feature go.
> 
>   Even if I promise to replace it with a fully-fledged and even more
> importantly, *correct* cross-compiler?  ;-)
> 
>     cheers,
>       DaveK
> 
> 
Sounds great, as long as it is simple enough for a dumb engineer who is 
not a programmer.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -