X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4A55ECD8.4060001@sidefx.com>
Date:	Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:12:56 -0400
From:	Edward Lam <edward AT sidefx DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] New package: dash-0.5.5.1-1
References:	<announce DOT 4A55DD6C DOT 8030203 AT byu DOT net>
In-Reply-To:	<announce.4A55DD6C.8030203@byu.net>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Eric Blake wrote:
> So for now, there are no plans of replacing /bin/sh with dash.

Incidentally, I copy ash.exe over to sh.exe every time for performance. 
AFAICT, /bin/sh defaulted to bash (from ash) back in the bash 3.0 series 
to be more "similar to Linux distributions". It took me quite some head 
scratching at the time to determine why my "make clean" would take ~2 
times slower.

Changing /bin/sh to dash of course else will now probably cause the 
headaches that Ubuntu users have experienced leading to proposals to 
change /bin/sh back to bash:
     http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/2225/

-Edward

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -