X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RHS_DOB
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4A471802.5030001@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Sun, 28 Jun 2009 02:13:06 -0500
From:	"Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [RFC] jpeg library
References:	<4A466538 DOT 8030007 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4A46FAA4 DOT 2 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <4A470ADF DOT 5010306 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
In-Reply-To:	<4A470ADF.5010306@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 28/06/2009 01:17, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Nope. Upstream development is DEAD.  There was some flurry of activity
> about two years ago, but it never went anywhere.   If IJG's libjpeg
> wasn't so widespread and widely used, I'd want to look at some other
> library that supports the format...

Actually, are you sure about that?  http://www.ijg.org/ lists a version 
7, released yesterday, as the current version.


Yaakov

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -