X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:13:02 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, newlib AT sourceware DOT org
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] Add "@cjknarrow" modifier (was Re: [Fwd: [1.7] wcwidth failing configure tests])
Message-ID:	<20090619121302.GX5039@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, newlib AT sourceware DOT org
References:	<200906051625 DOT n55GP6t3028411 AT mail DOT bln1 DOT bf DOT nsn-intra DOT net> <3f0ad08d0906060242t275a78e7tb9913bf78d1c5e83 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <200906121538 DOT n5CFcSld014997 AT mail DOT bln1 DOT bf DOT nsn-intra DOT net> <3f0ad08d0906140604y49c470eeu68c6c307ec1cd073 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <3f0ad08d0906140618w53c82556ye709c70efc1c65e0 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20090615084443 DOT GO5039 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <3f0ad08d0906150735g27576d41t7207970465e5d884 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20090615151420 DOT GT5039 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <200906181209 DOT n5IC9qW6023601 AT mail DOT bln1 DOT bf DOT nsn-intra DOT net> <200906191102 DOT n5JB2M0n001584 AT mail DOT bln1 DOT bf DOT nsn-intra DOT net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<200906191102.n5JB2M0n001584@mail.bln1.bf.nsn-intra.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-02-20)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Jun 19 13:02, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Despite IWAMURO Motonori's withdrawal, I think symmetry would be the 
> > right approach to take. The major aspect is how to reflect the actual 
> > behaviour of existing terminal environments. ...
> 
> > ...
> > The "locale interface" (syntax and semantics of LC_* strings) is defined 
> > in a modular way and so the implementations should be - let them fix it.
> 
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > What do you think, how big will be the acceptance of this approach
> > outside of newlib/Cygwin?
> 
> I have no idea about the acceptance of the whole concept, especially 
> (as I had warned) about changing the width of the CJK locales 
> WITHOUT modifier as IWAMURO Motonori insisted.
> But I guess a general solution of the width issue will be more 
> appreciated than one that handles only the CJK locales.

Well, if your proposal will be accepted by other projects, we can easily
extend our own implementation without changing existing functionality.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -