X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:31:15 +0200
From:	"Vincent R." <forumer AT smartmobili DOT com>
To:	Andy Koppe <andy DOT koppe AT gmail DOT com>
Cc:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Optimize cygwin on recent windows version (Vista and Seven)
In-Reply-To:	<416096c60906151139n45e0d967n8abee104fe194867@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<7c6dcbb9c797277cc8ffb1fc985844af AT mail DOT smartmobili DOT com> <416096c60906151139n45e0d967n8abee104fe194867 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID:	<4af3381770954501a1047738cf928219@mail.smartmobili.com>
X-Sender:	forumer AT smartmobili DOT com
User-Agent:	RoundCube Webmail/0.2
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:39:39 +0100, Andy Koppe <andy DOT koppe AT gmail DOT com>
wrote:
>> Until now I was using cygwin on Windows XP and I was satisfied by
>> cygwin-1.7 but these last few days
>> I switched to a more powerful laptop with very fast hardware (Core Duo
>> 3.0
>> Ghz and SSD OCZ Vertex)
>> and running windows Seven.
>> Now when I test cygwin, everything is so sloooooowww
> 
> Not exactly a helpful problem report. In what sort of scenarios do you
> find it to be slow? Is it actually slower than your old system?

Easy just try to rebuild a true software( for instance gcc) and you will
have
one year more between the moment you start the build and the moment it's
over.
I am not kidding, if you just "play" with cygwin of course you cannot
notice 
the problem.
If you like I could make some benchmark...


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -