X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4A35DEA7.10307@cygwin.com>
Date:	Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:39:51 -0400
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Installation problems
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 64 DOT 0906151303510 DOT 25048 AT calypso DOT view DOT net DOT au>
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0906151303510.25048@calypso.view.net.au>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 06/15/2009, Neanderthelle Jones wrote:
> (1) Headers such as <bits/wordsize.h> should be there when gcc &
> Co. are downloaded.  I personally know that Cygwin is 32 bit.  But the
> program build needs to be able to find that out portably, not by a
> Cygwin-specific hack.  It compiles on Linux: why not on Cygwin? 

<snip>

Looks like it's in 1.7, though you'll have to pull the source to get it.

<http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/winsup/cygwin/include/bits/?cvsroot=src>

> If there is some reason they can't be provided, 

If something is missing and you need it, then you're free to submit a
patch <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PTC>.  This is an open-source project
after all.

> if Cygwin is necessarily defective in that way, if it is necessary to buy 
> some Microsoft programming language compiler to get them, okay, but why was
> I not told?  Why is there nothing about it on the Cygwin site?  Why do
> I need to spend many hours discovering independently something that in
> that case is well-known to cognoscenti?

Oh, sorry.  Forget about my pointer to PTC.  It's clear you feel cheated
and just want to moan about how this open-source project has wronged you.
In that case, the proper link is:

<http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#WJM>

It's been withheld since there has been a sneaking suspicion for years
that you might need it and we didn't want to deprive you of this opportunity
to complain about it.  But wait, that would make us nice and considerate.
Hm, I guess we can't win on this one...

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -