X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Andrew Schulman <schulman DOT andrew AT epamail DOT epa DOT gov>
Subject:	Re: [1.7] Cannot read /proc/stat
Date:	Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:33:34 -0400
Lines:	6
Message-ID:	<igiq25hmtr9jm0j9v05qo8iarj25c0vd54@4ax.com>
References:	<4A2D3C62 DOT 40408 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <20090608171454 DOT GA25642 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Archive:	encrypt
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> (*) Is anybody here actually still using NT4?

Anyone still running NT4 has a security disaster on their hands.  Not that
that's a reason to cut them off of Cygwin... in fact they probably could
use the help... but Microsoft EOL'd NT4 years ago, and at some point it
seems that Cygwin should do the same.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -