Mail Archives: cygwin/2009/06/03/12:12:29
On Jun 3 12:02, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 04:27:55PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Jun 3 09:18, Edward Lam wrote:
> >> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>> The question is, what do you expect? [...]
> >> [...]
> >> Wikipedia has several suggestions on how to handle invalid UTF-8 byte
> >> sequences (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-8). Personally, I favor the
> >> rule that uses the replacement character.
> >
> >Chris implemented using the invalid code point solution. The discussion
> >in http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-utf8 AT nl DOT linux DOT org/msg00080.html
> >supports this solution. What's missing so far is the way back, from
> >an invalid single second half of a surrogate pair in the 0xDCxx range
> >back to the correct byte value. I'm just looking into that.
>
> The way back was not, AFAIK, needed for Cygwin programs. I don't think
> there is a valid way back for Windows programs.
The way back is not needed for the argv handling in Cygwin, but it
gets necessary if you converted to UTF-16 in other circumstances.
It's not much of a problem since the way back is a no-brainer, in
contrast to the conversion to UTF-16.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -