X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:38:53 +0200
To:	"Chris Green" <chris DOT h DOT green AT gmail DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: kerberos tools (kinit, etc) and kerberos-aware openssh in cygwin?
From:	"Matthias Andree" <matthias DOT andree AT gmx DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
References:	<49F72D97 DOT 4020300 AT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID:	<op.us5by3g31e62zd@balu.cs.uni-paderborn.de>
In-Reply-To:	<49F72D97.4020300@gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Opera Mail/9.64 (Win32)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Am 28.04.2009, 18:23 Uhr, schrieb Chris Green <chris DOT h DOT green AT gmail DOT com>:

> Hi,
>
> I have searched through the main mailing list archives and not come up
> with anything that seems even partially relevant except perhaps a recent
> email regarding LSA which did not seem to address my exact question. Is
> it possible for Cygwin to include a kerberos implementation (MIT or
> Heimdal, for instance) along with kerberos support compiled into the
> main openssh package? Are there any issues here that I'm not aware of?
> I've tried to compile the MIT package a couple of times without success
> but I don't know how much work it would be to get it going?
>
> I am aware of several scientists in my field (particle physics research)
> who rely on Cygwin and their old method of "getting around" was a
> one-off compile of a very old version of ssh that now does not talk to
> modern sshd servers properly provided by someone on an as-is basis
> several years ago. The currently-packaged openssh would work just fine
> if it were compiled with a set of kerberos libraries.
>
> Any help or suggestions for alternatives or existing documentation
> gratefully received.

Hi Chris,

the best alternative I'm aware of and I have been using successfully for  
some weeks now (to the extent possible in PuTTY, which has some rough  
edges in Unicode and screen line drawing support) is a patched PuTTY  
snapshot with MIT Kerberos support, courteously provided by Matthew Loar.  
For details, please see <http://matthew.loar.name/software/putty/>.

HTH

-- 
Matthias Andree

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -