www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_43,SPF_PASS |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <49C84D31.3040801@gmail.com> |
Date: | Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:02:09 +0800 |
From: | KHMan <keinhong AT gmail DOT com> |
User-Agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: rsync under cygwin too slow |
References: | <49C7E50F DOT 1050804 AT princeton DOT edu> <DE0B8EAC-9D86-4B7B-89F7-C64897AB7C05 AT von-campe DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <DE0B8EAC-9D86-4B7B-89F7-C64897AB7C05@von-campe.com> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Alfred von Campe wrote: >> rsync -rtuplg --stats --verbose --progress --modify-window=2 >> /cygdrive/c/localfolder /cygdrive/z/backups/ >> ... >> ... >> The local and remote folders were already synchronized, that is why 0 >> files were transferred. File list generation did take only 3 minutes >> but the whole process took more than 1.5 hours to finish and consumed >> a whopping 1.9 GB of downloaded bytes and 0.4 GB of uploaded bytes as >> per network counters. For what? Zero files, Zero bytes of file data. > > I'm pretty sure this is because rsync has to copy all the files locally > to compare them to see if they need to be copied. Try running the rsync > as a service on the system that hosts the Z: drive (or run rsync over > ssh to the system that hosts the Z drive) and you will see large > performance improvement. > >> As far as I can see, rsync under cygwin is also too slow to be useful. > > This has nothing to do with Cygwin or rsync. If you ran ROBOCOPY under > Windows using the same setup you would see the same performance penalty. Agree, I mirror stuff locally and to external drives using Cygwin's rsync and sync'ing identical trees is never that slow. Could it be a security program? For example, AVG 8 Free checks for malware by default, IIRC, and the speed impact is really noticeable, even on a basic dual core. I turned off that feature after less than 5 minutes. -- Cheers, Kein-Hong Man (esq.) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |