X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<49C794CB.3010305@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:55:23 +0000
From:	Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: PING: Deprecation of -mno-cygwin.
References:	<49C6DADF DOT 90305 AT gmail DOT com> <20090323093234 DOT GK9322 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <49C78FA2 DOT 4010209 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <alpine DOT LRH DOT 0 DOT 9999 DOT 0903230939480 DOT 20344 AT honker DOT vgersoft DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.LRH.0.9999.0903230939480.20344@honker.vgersoft.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Steve Thompson wrote:
> uOn Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> 
>> Please, NO!  -mno-cygwin needs to go away already.
> 
> Why?
> 

  It's a bit of a kludge compared to having a real honest-to-god
cross-compiler.  It's never worked entirely right in terms of keeping cygwin
and mingw headers and libs completely separate.  A full-blown mingw
cross-compiler won't cost that much in terms of disk space and the reliability
and correctness improvements will be worth it.

    cheers,
      DaveK

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -