www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <49C4E79E.3000005@cwilson.fastmail.fm> |
Date: | Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:11:58 -0400 |
From: | Charles Wilson <cygwin AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090302 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: under cygwin, zsh cannot run when built against ncurses9-5.7-13 |
References: | <20a807210903131414g62e0a53cyefd3938c3fe8af33 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <49BADAC1 DOT 80709 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <gpf7kk$2g6$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <gpfcdo$a30$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <gpgeu9$iuo$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 64 DOT 0903142203230 DOT 9859 AT gremlin DOT fruitbat DOT org> <49BF1770 DOT 9020007 AT gmail DOT com> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 64 DOT 0903202238560 DOT 16691 AT gremlin DOT fruitbat DOT org> |
In-Reply-To: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0903202238560.16691@gremlin.fruitbat.org> |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Peter A. Castro wrote: > True, the name does not fit the "current" naming convention for cygwin > DLLs, but it doesn't really matter too much, since this particular DLL is > private to zsh (it's really the core of zsh, which zsh.exe loads > implicitly). Since its an "internal" (to zsh) DLL and not useable by any > other program I felt it was exempt from the naming "rules". Is there a > strong technical reason to rename it? If so, I will do so. I think the issue is, since zsh is built using libtool (right?) libtool ought to DTRT. Since it is not, it seems something is going wrong in the build process; libtool doesn't "know" that it's supposed to be building cygwin libraries. So, what *else* is libtool doing wrong, as it happily runs through its (linux? sun? sgi?)-specific code... > BTW, good catch on the import libs being bad. It's nice to know it's > *not my fault, man!* :-) Heh. -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |