www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | ABCD <en DOT ABCD AT gmail DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: gcc4: cc |
Date: | Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:47:25 -0400 |
Lines: | 76 |
Message-ID: | <gprmle$9u9$1@ger.gmane.org> |
References: | <49C0467A DOT 1080404 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <49C07906 DOT 2060504 AT gmail DOT com> <49C07E09 DOT 5070909 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <49C0E323 DOT 9000109 AT byu DOT net> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090106) |
In-Reply-To: | <49C0E323.9000109@byu.net> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Eric Blake wrote: > According to Yaakov (Cygwin/X) on 3/17/2009 10:52 PM: >> Dave Korn wrote: >>> Ah, thanks for pointing this out. (The packages are of course broken as far >>> as portability is concerned, as upstream GCC does not anywhere provide a 'cc' >>> executable; it's presence in the gcc-3 package is caused by the build script >>> creating a symlink as a convenience, so it's wrong in general to assume that >>> there "must be" an executable called 'cc' in the PATH.) I'll add it back into >>> the next release. >> Actually, SUSv2 requires a cc and c89; SUSv3 mentions only a c99. > > So it would be nice to have all three names. And perhaps c89 (but not the > others) should imply --std=gnu89. > Just as a point of reference, Gentoo Linux provides c89 and c99 as shell scripts, which contain the following: - ----- 8< ----- /usr/bin/c89 ----- 8< ----- #! /bin/sh # Call the appropriate C compiler with options to accept ANSI/ISO C # The following options are the same (as of gcc-2.95): # -ansi # -std=c89 # -std=iso9899:1990 for i; do case "$i" in -ansi|-std=c89|-std=iso9899:1990) ;; -std=*) echo >&2 "`basename $0` called with non ANSI/ISO C90 option $i" exit 1 ;; esac done exec gcc -std=c89 -pedantic -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE "$@" - ----- 8< ----- /usr/bin/c99 ----- 8< ----- #! /bin/sh # Call the appropriate C compiler with options to accept ANSI/ISO C # The following options are the same (as of gcc-3.3): # -std=c99 # -std=c9x # -std=iso9899:1999 # -std=iso9899:199x for i; do case "$i" in -std=c9[9x]|-std=iso9899:199[9x]) ;; -ansi|-std=*) echo >&2 "`basename $0` called with non ANSI/ISO C99 option $i" exit 1 ;; esac done exec gcc -std=c99 -pedantic -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE ${1+"$@"} - ----- 8< ---------- 8< ---------- 8< ----- - -- ABCD -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknBXd0ACgkQOypDUo0oQOqZFgCeNL1a3syrYs1d6lG75tIhM834 DpEAnjmvgY4vfxwZWadv2lYRNpYZa/v6 =OZJf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |