www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <49BD8F0D.5010906@gmail.com> |
Date: | Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:28:13 +0000 |
From: | Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com> |
User-Agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: gcc4-java: packaging error? |
References: | <49BD3870 DOT 3030501 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <49BD43BB DOT 7080808 AT gmail DOT com> <49BD7D85 DOT 2030701 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> |
In-Reply-To: | <49BD7D85.2030701@users.sourceforge.net> |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >> I do not know yet if the Eclipse Java compiler license is compatible with >> the Cygwin license, so for the moment I haven't shipped it in the distro. >> (OTOH it now looks like maybe I could have used it while building libgcj >> without needing to distribute it.) > > IANAL, but ecj is just a jar file; it isn't linked against cygwin, so as > long as its license allows for redistribution, how could it be > incompatible with Cygwin's license? It probably isn't, but making certain is just something I ran out of time for before the release. >> There are bugs in the java distro right now which I'll try and fix before >> the next major release (but not for the rapid-respin I'm liable to do first). > > So I see. I see that Debian builds gcj and all the java stuff > separately from the other gcc backends; maybe such a setup would be > helpful here as well? I'll take a look, thanks. cheers, DaveK -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |