X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<497C7843.8030504@byu.net>
Date:	Sun, 25 Jan 2009 07:33:39 -0700
From:	Eric Blake <ebb9 AT byu DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Sjors Gielen <mailinglist AT dazjorz DOT com>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, debian-kcygwin-devel AT lists DOT sourceforge DOT net,
	Ed Schouten <ed AT 80386 DOT nl>
Subject:	Re: [bugreport] Two slashes should not indicate remote machine or special directory
References:	<497C6D52 DOT 5050504 AT dazjorz DOT com> <497C72F8 DOT 8040503 AT byu DOT net> <497C7785 DOT 3000605 AT dazjorz DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<497C7785.3000605@dazjorz.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to Sjors Gielen on 1/25/2009 7:30 AM:
> I figured this was by design, but I didn't know there was an explicit
> exception in POSIX for this.
> However, as I'm sure you're aware, there are a lot of Linux applications
> which depend on, for example, //etc being the same as /etc. These all
> have to be patched to use ///etc or /etc.

Yes - any app that uses //etc when they meant /etc or ///etc are buggy
according to POSIX, and that is one of the joys of porting buggy apps to
cygwin.

> 
> How much of Cygwin will be broken if we remove //remoteserver as an
> equivalent to Windows \\remoteserver?

I use it all the time.  It would break my usage patterns.

> Wouldn't it be a better solution
> to provide an alternative for //remoteserver, i.e.
> /cygdrive/net/remoteserver or maybe even net://remoteserver or
> smb://remoteserver? This would fix both the problem with Linux
> compatibility, and still leave this feature in Cygwin.

http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PTC

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             ebb9 AT byu DOT net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkl8eEMACgkQ84KuGfSFAYCfpwCgiPwE8Wgqr/MzBC5pjPtJbAEV
6w8An3bZjVB0aBVivvx8KedId3lqXZ7E
=h5pD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -