www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <5520d94f0901131057o3cbb3915h95b824942d95be6c@mail.gmail.com> |
Date: | Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:57:11 -0800 |
From: | "greenup greenup" <greenup AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: rm seems to fail |
In-Reply-To: | <f60fe000901131024q5a600fc0haa6e076196c98b1e@mail.gmail.com> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
References: | <5520d94f0901130852l310a9dfdk9821c26458d8d5e AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5520d94f0901130901y66a7df50yca7e586998a3bea3 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5520d94f0901130916l7669d8capa39587365237da4f AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <f60fe000901131024q5a600fc0haa6e076196c98b1e AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 1/13/09, Mark J. Reed <markjreed AT gmail DOT com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:16 PM, greenup wrote: > > oh, I forgot to mention: right after doing the rm, the return code is > > success, even though it failed to actually remove the file. > rm with -f is silent about certain types of errors, usually of the > "file doesn't exist" variety. So that sounds like rm thinks that > > Is rm without -f able to remove goo/foo (after you confirm at the > prompt)? If not, does it generate an error indication? Nope. no error. Looking farther for an error, I tried to see if I could get more verbose, and found "-v". It seemed to just further indicate that rm thought it had done its job. dz AT w2 ~ $ rm -v goo/foo rm: remove write-protected regular empty file `goo/foo'? y removed `goo/foo' dz AT w2 ~ $ echo $? 0 dz AT w2 ~ $ ls -la goo total 0 drwxr-xr-x+ 2 dz mkgroup-l-d 0 Jan 13 08:10 . drwxrwx---+ 23 Administrators SYSTEM 0 Jan 13 10:01 .. -r-------- 1 dz mkgroup-l-d 0 Jan 13 08:18 foo obviously, LOTS AND LOTS of scripts and makefiles depend on rm -f. This is bad. (for me, at least) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |