www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <496A5C5D.9030703@gmail.com> |
Date: | Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:53:49 +0000 |
From: | Andy Koppe <andy DOT koppe AT gmail DOT com> |
User-Agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Signal handling in Win32 GUI programs |
References: | <496A1DBC DOT 7070004 AT gmail DOT com> <20090111163729 DOT GB9992 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <496A24DE DOT 1080101 AT gmail DOT com> <20090111180740 DOT GC10049 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> |
In-Reply-To: | <20090111180740.GC10049@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
>> I've added a thread doing 'for (;;) pause();', but unfortunately that >> doesn't seem to do the trick. Do I need to go into Cygwin internals and >> wait directly on the Win32 event(s) used for signals? > > sigwait() will probably work better than pause. That indeed works, thank you very much! I didn't know that function, very handy. With that and threads, signal handlers with all their vagaries aren't really needed anymore, are they? And speaking of threads, does it make a difference whether one uses Pthreads or Win32 threads? I mean apart from portability and the small overhead Pthreads presumably incur. MinTTY's got three such little helper threads hanging about now, doing waitpid() on the child process, read() on the child pty, and the abovementioned sigwait(). Would there be any point in trying to consolidate them into a single sigwait() process, using SIGCHLD and asynchronous reads? Andy -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |