X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
Resent-Message-ID:	<20081210230834 DOT 30307 DOT qmail AT sourceware DOT org>
Message-ID:	<074401c95b1a$d16fc450$3201a8c0@aew2knew>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20081210174922 DOT GA2339 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <slrngk0ebn DOT 1ii6 DOT oudeis AT isis DOT thalatta DOT eme>
Subject:	Re: cygwin and cygwin-xfree lists to merge
Date:	Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:58:27 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
From:	Andreas Eibach <aeibach DOT ml AT googlemail DOT com>
Resent-From:	root AT sourceware DOT org
Resent-Date:	Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:08:34 +0000
Resent-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Will Parsons wrote:
> You may not consider it a compelling argument, but I find the traffic on
> the cygwin list more than enough already, and am glad I don't have to
> bother about the cygwin-xfree traffic.  I'd prefer to keep things as
> is.

But on xfree, there IS NO traffic!
Just check the archives to get an insight into this:

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/

This is ridiculously few compared to 2 years ago when Harold L Hunt put
more work into this _per week_ than all people together summed up from
summer to
end of this year!

-Andreas




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -