X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<960297 DOT 52729 DOT qm AT web51504 DOT mail DOT re2 DOT yahoo DOT com>
Subject:	RE: octave-3.0.2-2 Requires gcc4
Date:	Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:10:20 +0100
Message-ID:	<00c801c92e17$5e0fa960$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To:	<960297.52729.qm@web51504.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

James R. Phillips wrote on 14 October 2008 16:14:

> Hi,
> 
> The experimental version of octave, octave-3.0.2-2, compiled with gcc4,
> requires gcc4 to be installed in order to use the gcc4 runtime libraries.

  It only requires gcc4-runtime, then.

> Currently setup.exe will allow octave-3.0.2-2 to be installed without
> requiring gcc4 to also be installed. This should be addressed to avoid
> non-functional installations of octave.    

  I don't think it's possible to specify different dependencies for the
"current" and "test" versions of a package, so in general it makes sense that
they should be right for the mainstream ("current") version, otherwise
everyone using the "current" version would be obliged to install an unneeded
package.  (This could be a good feature enhancement for setup.exe et al., but
it isn't possible yet).

  Anyone using "experimental" package versions is expected to be alert to the
possibilities of complications that might need a bit of manual intervention;
that's the reason why they aren't installed by default.  It's a minor
oversight that Marco forgot to mention this issue in the release announcement,
but it's probably too late to do anything about; there probably won't be
another octave test release before gcc4 goes mainstream anyway.  (At which
point we may even put gcc4-runtime into the "Base" category and make sure
everybody gets it installed regardless; but I don't want to think about that
until I'm sure it'll be stable.)


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -