www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Date: | Mon, 8 Sep 2008 18:32:55 -0400 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Difficulty building gcc 4.3.2 under i386-pc-cygwin |
Message-ID: | <20080908223255.GA18802@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <1220909037 DOT 6401 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <COL101-W55107222466828EA3A4B5FE6550 AT phx DOT gbl> <20080908214759 DOT GA18503 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <028301c91200$a6a37540$9601a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <028301c91200$a6a37540$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:17:16PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote on 08 September 2008 22:48: > >> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 09:43:37PM +0000, Jay wrote: >>> You can build gcc 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 just fine from the existing Cygwin gcc >>> 3.x package. >>> >>> The error also /appeared/ to have the object directory under the source >>> directory. Don't do that. >> >> Huh? There's no reason not to do this. I do it all of the time. > > It is unsupported: > >http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html > >"... building where objdir is a subdirectory of srcdir is unsupported." What's that? An actual reference to a definitive source? Do you think that will ever catch on? I have been building gcc like that (and also in a completely separate directory) for many years, but if this officially unsanctioned then, nevermind. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |