X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<015801c90686$08c19b20$67c864c0@andrew>
Reply-To:	"Trans-Mit Support" <support AT transmit DOT com DOT au>
From:	"Trans-Mit Support" <support AT transmit DOT com DOT au>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Fw: End of support for 9x
Date:	Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:41:49 +1000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-RPD-ScanID:	Class unknown; VirusThreatLevel unknown, RefID str=0001.0A150202.48B2629A.004F,ss=1,fgs=0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Haven't had many bad experiences with Win98,
and now being serious, I do use XP and cygwin,
but still prefer Win98 performance cf. XP on same H/W
Its just a pitty I won't be able to keep the CYGWIN up to date on my WIN98

>> Its bad enough having to use windows, but having to upgrade to XP or 
>> VISTA
>> is just out of the question.
>>
> I'm not surprised that you're having bad experiences with Windows if you
> insist on using obsolete, unsupported software that wasn't designed for
> modern hardware.  I expect I'd have a lot of problems too if I reinstalled
> Version 4 of Suse which I first bought over a decade ago.
>
> The jury's still out when it comes to Vista - but for XP, many users have
> found it to be a highly stable OS.  Personally, I find XP to be more 
> stable
> than 64Studio which is easily the most stable of the (ten) Linux distros
> that I've tried.  And Win2K is also excellent, as Derek suggested.
>
> Admittedly, XP's "Fisher Price" look is offputting but you don't need to
> use it.  I prefer the 'classic' look which I've used ever since XP first
> came out.  I've never once had any incompatibility problem with it.
>
> Give it a try - you might be pleasantly surprised.
>
> John
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Trans-Mit Support" <support AT transmit DOT com DOT au>
> To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
> Sent: 25 August 2008 06:10
> Subject: End of support for 9x
>
>
>> Re:-
>>> Note that the official support for Windows 95, Windows 98, and Windows 
>>> Me
>>> will be discontinued with the >
>>> next major version (1.7.0) of Cygwin.
>>
>> Its bad enough having to use windows, but having to upgrade to XP or 
>> VISTA
>> is just out of the question. Looks like I won't be using any new versions
>> of cygwyn
>>
>>
>> --
>> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
>> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
>> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
>>
>
> 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -