X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Francis Litterio <flitterio AT gmail DOT com>
Subject:	Re: ABI unification
Date:	Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:48:18 -0400
Lines:	12
Message-ID:	<u7iatprxr.fsf@gmail.com>
References:	<1218043716 DOT 30536 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <COL101-W752A63DF14AA0636D07886E67A0 AT phx DOT gbl> <005501c8f81b$575346e0$9601a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Draft-From:	("nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.os.cygwin" 99568)
Gcc:	nnfolder:sent-usenet
X-Random-Quote:	When a noble life has prepared old age, it is not decline that it reveals, but the first days of immortality. -- Germaine De Stael
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (windows-nt)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Dave Korn wrote:

>> Perhaps this can be "fixed" for any non-x86 Cygwin port?
>
>   The very concept of a non-x86 Cygwin port is meaningless nonsense.  You
> need to do a bit more homework.  I suggest you start by reading the first
> sentence on the first page at http://cygwin.com/.

Doesn't Windows Server 2003 run on Intel's Itanium processor?
Technically, that's a non-x86 Windows platform.
--
Fran


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -