www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
X-MDRemoteIP: | 212.135.219.182 |
X-Return-Path: | prvs=1071fe6e81=killing AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk |
X-Envelope-From: | killing AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk |
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-ID: | <9D7615DFA8F94C3BBF6E1295BF48F185@multiplay.co.uk> |
From: | "Steven Hartland" <killing AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk> |
To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
References: | <E0174AD446AE4AF786ED30C69C9529CC AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk> <20080703125758 DOT GC10582 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <9519CD6573CA4B378AB436808C330A8C AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk> <20080704015038 DOT GA1982 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <AC7C246AA3674216917E55858EC99322 AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk> <20080704145730 DOT GA3674 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> |
Subject: | Re: valid messages refused as spam ( was: chmod permission denied on windows 2008 ) |
Date: | Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:53:18 +0100 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 |
X-Spam-Processed: | mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:53:22 +0100 |
X-MDAV-Processed: | mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:53:23 +0100 |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" > If you think you are being blocked inappropriately, do what the bounce > message tells you and send email to postmaster. And, if at all possible, > leave out words like "annoying" and "broken". When this happens there is no real "bounce" just our mail server reporting the message failed to send. I've included a snip from the message as it may be helpful to diagnose the issues, but is seems like the spam filter software is simply getting things wrong. We've had that in the past here due to Bayesian learning and the only solution was to flush the previous learned data. [refused] Thu 2008-07-03 23:01:32: --> RCPT To:<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> Thu 2008-07-03 23:01:32: <-- 250 <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, recipient ok Thu 2008-07-03 23:01:32: --> DATA Thu 2008-07-03 23:01:32: <-- 354 go ahead Thu 2008-07-03 23:01:32: Sending <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\pd35001664007.msg> to [209.132.176.174] Thu 2008-07-03 23:01:33: Transfer Complete Thu 2008-07-03 23:02:04: <-- 552 spam score exceeded threshold Thu 2008-07-03 23:02:04: --> QUIT [/refused] Regards Steve -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |