X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<200802181525 DOT m1IFPlBS035653 AT member DOT newsguy DOT com> <001601c8729a$8b72dd70$020aa8c0 AT DFW5RB41> <loom DOT 20080220T144900-251 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
Subject:	RE: Cygwin setup: DL rate should show as kB/s not kb/s ?
Date:	Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:03:13 -0600
Message-ID:	<000d01c87425$890afdb0$020aa8c0@DFW5RB41>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To:	<loom.20080220T144900-251@post.gmane.org>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> From: Bill Meier
> 
> Gary R. Van Sickle writes:
> 
> > 
> > > From:  Bill Meier
> > > or maybe KB/s for kilobytes/sec ?
> > > 
> > 
> > It should be an option, but that begs an "Options..." dialog, which 
> > doesn't exist.
> > 
> 
> 
> Unfortunately I didn't express myself clearly in my original message.
> 
> The numeric DLL rate shown by the Cygwin setup program is 
> actually in units of K Bytes/sec and thus either kB/s or KB/s 
> should be used as the text following the numeric rate.
> 

Ohhh, oh oh oh, ok.  Yeah, then I suppose kB/s is the correct way to go, if
my SI serves me right (and please, no "kibbis", lordy).

My point stands though: it would be a useful addition to have this
user-selectable, as in some other file transfer programs.  But my
counterpoint also stands: no options dialog.

> Looking at the code I also note that maybe the 2nd sprintf 
> should be changed to use %03.1f to be consistent with the 1st 
> sprintf ...
> 

Ooof, still using C string manipulation I see.  That brings back some
memories....

-- 
Gary R. Van Sickle


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -