X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Eric Lilja <mindcooler AT gmail DOT com>
Subject:	Slightly off-topic, but...
Date:	Tue, 29 May 2007 17:46:03 +0200
Lines:	27
Message-ID:	<f3hhrr$qt1$1@sea.gmane.org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Hi, I've installed qt-win-opensource-4.2.3-mingw.exe from trolltech and 
I'm using the tools installed by cygwin to develop Qt programs. Well, 
one could argue I'm not really using cygwin because I have to pass 
-mno-cygwin when compiling otherwise I get errors for non-trivial programs.
Anyway, -mno-cygwin makes the executables dependent on mingwm10.dll 
instead of cygwin1.dll, correct? Since my QT programs depend on this dll 
I can only start them from a cygwin shell since cygwin itself is not in 
windows path (and I don't think it should be).
My question is how safe is it to put mingwm10.dll in the windows path so 
I can start my qt programs from explorer? That would mean having two 
copies of the same dll in the path under cygwin...which I know is bad 
for cygwin1.dll. I was thinking of writing a startup script that checks 
that the files are identical so I know when I need to update the copy. I 
also tried to put a shortcut to the dll but that didn't work which was 
very unfortunate I think.

Any comments welcome...sorry for being off-topic, but maybe this is of 
interest to people using cygwin and maybe want to develop Qt programs 
and don't have a real mingw installation (I don't).

- Eric

PS. I know -mno-cygwin is probably going to be removed in a future 
version of cygwin's compiler, does that mean I would have to maintain a 
real mingw installation to develop Qt programs? I have MSVC++ as well, 
but I believe the Qt version for MSVC++ costs money. Maybe I will buy 
that later when I really need a debugger I can wrap my head around, heh. DS.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -