www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
From: | "Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com> |
To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
References: | <2b2c01c78fa5$d94a27c0$0200a8c0 AT AMD2500> <01f001c78fc6$c916ce00$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <463DDE7F DOT 5010105 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <022c01c78ff1$545f4ad0$2e08a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <463DF64F DOT 2080109 AT aol DOT com> |
Subject: | RE: Successful build of GCC 4.2.0 RC3 on latest Cygwin snapshot 20070427 |
Date: | Sun, 6 May 2007 16:44:02 +0100 |
Message-ID: | <022e01c78ff5$5ed734b0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Office Outlook 11 |
In-Reply-To: | <463DF64F.2080109@aol.com> |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 06 May 2007 16:38, Tim Prince wrote: > dave DOT korn AT artimi PCYM Tim, thanks >> On 06 May 2007 14:56, Charles Wilson wrote: >> >>> [removed mailing lists other than cygwin] >>> >>> Dave Korn wrote: > >>> So don't anybody here on the cygwin list get too excited yet. <g> >> >> Didn't actually spot the cygwin list had been cc'd in at first, but yes, >> I'm just helping test the upstream release, this is not going to turn into >> a cygwin package in the immediate future. >> > > Is it reasonable to assume, then, that gcc 4.3 has as much chance of > becoming a cygwin package, and put some effort into cleaning that up for > cygwin? All this work has to go in on mainline as a matter of course. It will then become part of whichever is the next release branch. There's next to no chance of getting consent to back-port what is essentially new functionality rather than regression fixes. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |