X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<45EF36D7.7000701@t-online.de>
Date:	Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:04:07 +0100
From:	Christian Franke <Christian DOT Franke AT t-online DOT de>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2pre) Gecko/20070111 SeaMonkey/1.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin speed
References:	<45E86FFD DOT 7060301 AT princeton DOT edu> <45E876FA DOT 7401B017 AT dessent DOT net> <20070305011713 DOT GG6734 AT ns1 DOT anodized DOT com> <45EF1CED DOT 608 AT t-online DOT de> <loom DOT 20070307T221839-665 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
In-Reply-To:	<loom.20070307T221839-665@post.gmane.org>
X-ID:	SOU5oyZ1QegBaiPXvPuzIDWsZlwop83L+-imEz81lonflSa25RGfwy
X-TOI-MSGID:	e4939601-fb81-4d43-a71d-26d14ba9f76b
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Eric Blake wrote:
> ...
> And the way I see it, if the mask is unchanged, then any signal that was 
> unblocked before calling sigprocmask() should have already fired.  In other 
> words, the only signals that sigprocmask() HAS to worry about are signals that 
> just changed to unmasked;...
>   

To handle this case, wouldn't it be necessary to call 
sig_dispatch_pending() *after* set_signal_mask() has unblocked the signal?

Christian


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -