X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:45:01 -0500
From:	Brian Ford <Brian DOT Ford AT FlightSafety DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin 1.5.18: Problem using setsockopt() for multicast
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.LNX.4.21.0608170139450.20778-100000@aass.oru.se>
Message-ID:	<Pine.CYG.4.58.0608170836160.2408@PC1163-8460-XP.flightsafety.com>
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0608170139450 DOT 20778-100000 AT aass DOT oru DOT se>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Alessandro Saffiotti wrote:

> I ran into the following problem when using setsockopt to create a
> multicast receiver in my own application.  Here is the relevant part
> of the code:
>
>   tcp_broadcast_receiver = socket(PF_INET,SOCK_DGRAM,IPPROTO_IP);
>
>   memset(&imreq, 0, sizeof(struct ip_mreq));
>   imreq.imr_multiaddr.s_addr = inet_addr("227.1.3.5");
>   imreq.imr_interface.s_addr = INADDR_ANY;

INADDR_ANY is in host byte order, but you need network order for this
call.

-- 
Brian Ford
Lead Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
the best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained crew...

.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -