www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
X-VirusChecked: | Checked |
X-Env-Sender: | nvalster AT motorola DOT com |
X-Msg-Ref: | server-5.tower-125.messagelabs.com!1148822415!12521788!1 |
X-StarScan-Version: | 5.5.9.1; banners=-,-,- |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Subject: | multiple commands on a single line seem to run in the background automatically |
Date: | Sun, 28 May 2006 14:19:02 +0100 |
Message-ID: | <7CFBCCAA27B7934C9307AB098F728A53539BFD@zuk35exm61.ds.mot.com> |
From: | "Valster Nico-anv009" <nvalster AT motorola DOT com> |
To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
X-White-List-Member: | TRUE |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id k4SDMw1Y009892 |
I'm working on a bash script to automate the build process. The script calls, depending on the parameters the Microsoft VC6 compiler and/or the GreenHills compiler and/or the Cygwin GCC for one or more project/makefiles. If I invoke the script like: c:/bat/sbuild ...... things work pretty well. However if I invoke it as cd /cygdrive/d/CCase/anv009_SPRINT_8/SPRINT_VOB/SPRINT;c:/bat/sbuild ..... it does not work as expected. The ..... symbolizes the parameters which are in both cases the same and are not relevant for the problem (I think) In the first scenario, the prompt does not reappear till the script is completed (this may be several minutes). In the second scenario, the prompt returns much earlier but I also get compilation errors. If I check the Windows taskmanager, then the Microsoft compiler is still consuming close to 100% of the processor, but it will end in due time. Why does in the 2nd scenario the Microsoft compiler runs in the background (at least that is my idea what is happening) while the 1st scenario behaves as I expect/want? Nico Valster -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |