| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
| Message-ID: | <n2m-g.drc625.3vva5g7.1@buzzy-box.bavag> |
| From: | "Buzz" <cygwin DOT buzz AT bavag DOT tmfweb DOT nl> |
| Subject: | Re: Shell (bash, (pd)ksh, zsh, /not/ ash) + exec + here-doc + redirect == trouble! |
| References: | <012520062028 DOT 10525 DOT 43D7DF6F0008E6E60000291D22007507840A050E040D0C079D0A AT comcast DOT net> |
| Reply-To: | cygwin mailing-list <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| Organisation: | Ehm... |
| User-Agent: | slrn/0.9.8.1 (Win32) Hamster/2.1.0.0 KorrNews/4.2.1 |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| In-Reply-To: | <012520062028.10525.43D7DF6F0008E6E60000291D22007507840A050E040D0C079D0A@comcast.net> |
| Lines: | 42 |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Jan 2006 04:08:47 +0100 (MET) |
| X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
[No need to Cc me.]
Op Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:28:32 +0000 schreef Eric Blake
in <012520062028.10525.43D7DF6F0008E6E60000291D22007507840A050E040D0C079D0A<at>comcast.net>:
[Adding attrib to self:]
: Buzz:
: > I (now) understand what's happening. I think it's undesirable, though.
:
: That's a relative viewpoint. Personally, I like the fact that
: the rules are consistent (process instructions one line at
: a time; and apply pipelines first, then apply all redirections,
: including here-docs, in left-to-right order), and that the
: rules allow you to save stdin without having it be fd 0
Sure, but to have the shell redirect /it's own/ input instead of the
input of it's sub-commands is counter-intuitive _and_ counter-
productive IMO. I like to write things like:
exec sh 5<&0 <<EOSH
exec 0<&5
vim "$0"
echo -n 'Edit OK? (yes/gigo)'
read a
if test "\$a" = yes ; then
"$0" "$@"
fi
exit 0
EOSH
which is fine if sh == ash...
...but this is OT. I'll try find a more appropriate forum.
L8r,
Buzz.
--
) | | ---/ ---/ Yes, this | This message consists of true | I do not
-- | | / / really is | and false bits entirely. | mail for
) | | / / a 72 by 4 +-------------------------------+ any1 but
-- \--| /--- /--- .sigfile. | |perl -pe "s.u(z)\1.as." | me. 4^re
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |