www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <43B9874D.1040002@cygwin.com> |
Date: | Mon, 02 Jan 2006 15:04:29 -0500 |
From: | "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050929 Thunderbird/1.0.7 Fedora/1.0.7-1.1.fc4 Mnenhy/0.7.3.0 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | Lapo Luchini <lapo AT lapo DOT it> |
CC: | "[ML] CygWin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: rsync over ssh hang issue understood |
References: | <43B90C5F DOT 6050004 AT lapo DOT it> |
In-Reply-To: | <43B90C5F.6050004@lapo.it> |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Lapo Luchini wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > > On Dec 30 17:23, Brett Serkez wrote: > > > I have rsync working over ssh on Cygwin. > > > > Me too. I'm using the standard version of rsync, so I guess the > > socketpair call is still in use. > > I never managed to reproduce that problem, neither, on any of my hosts. > (and I always use rsync over ssh, almost never as a daemon) > > Brett Serkez writes: > >> While use of socketpair() may be a better method, use of pipe() does >> work and I'd request that the rsync package maintainer please rebuild >> the package with this build option change and reissue the package so all >> can benefit. > > I may well produce such a package, but I wonder if it would work on all > people or not. > Maybe it could be marked as a "test" package so that people could > install it only explicitly clicking on version number, in setup. Haven't we been here before? I would swear that there has been some toggling before between these two options to fix other problems. While I suppose that changes in the past don't necessarily preclude tromping over the same ground now or in the future, presumably it only makes sense to do so if other things have changed to make it worthwhile to consider now. Maybe it's worth a little archive searching before putting much effort into generating alternative package configurations for consideration/use. Just a thought. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |