| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| From: | Krzysztof Duleba <krzysan AT skrzynka DOT pl> |
| Subject: | Re: perl - segfault on "free unused scalar" |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:56:19 +0200 |
| Lines: | 44 |
| Message-ID: | <dc8ebq$36m$1@sea.gmane.org> |
| References: | <dc7n8k$m72$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <42E76865 DOT 4000301 AT familiehaase DOT de> <dc82t0$r0a$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <42E7B413 DOT 8040203 AT familiehaase DOT de> |
| Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
| User-Agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) |
| In-Reply-To: | <42E7B413.8040203@familiehaase.de> |
| X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>> $ ./inter.pl
>>> perl> sub foo($){$a=shift;foo($a+1);}
>>> perl> foo 1
>>> Out of memory during request for 4040 bytes, total sbrk() is
>>> 402624512 bytes!
>>> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>>
>> Another version (with "my $a"):
>>
>> perl> sub foo($){my $a=shift;foo($a+1);}
>> perl> foo 1
>> Out of memory during "large" request for 134221824 bytes, total sbrk()
>> is 304633856 bytes at (eval 19) line 1.
>> perl> foo 1
>> Bad realloc() ignored at (eval 19) line 1.
>> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>>
>> Is this a perl bug, Cygwin bug, or just a feature?
>
> I don't know. Maybe it is a Windows feature that applications running
> out of memory are crashing?
But there's plenty of memory left when perl crashes. I have 1 GB RAM and 1
GB swap file.
I've simplified the test case. It seems that Cygwin perl can't handle too
much memory. For instance:
$ perl -e '$a="a"x(200 * 1024 * 1024); sleep 9'
OK, this could have failed because $a might require 200 MB of continuous
space. But hashes don't, do they? Then why does the following code fail?
$ perl -e '$a="a"x(1024 * 1024);my %b; $b{$_}=$a for(1..400);sleep 9'
Or that one?
$ perl -e '$a="a"x(50 * 1024 * 1024);$b=$a;$c=$a;$d=$a;$e=$a;sleep 10'
On linux there's no such problem - perl can use all available memory.
Krzysztof Duleba
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |