www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | "Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com> |
To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | RE: What's in it for Redhat? |
Date: | Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:49:50 +0100 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <9bbd279405072604461f18ac87@mail.gmail.com> |
Message-ID: | <SERRANOdl1eCsgTG9Lb0000071f@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM> |
----Original Message---- >From: Alex Goldman >Sent: 26 July 2005 12:47 > I'm curious, why did Redhat develop (or sponsor) Cygwin? It makes more > business sense for Microsoft to do so, and they do have the > misleadingly named Windows Services for UNIX: > > http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/sfu/productinfo/default.mspx > > (It has NFS client that seems to be missing from Cygwin) It's all part of a conspiracy. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |